Search blog.co.uk

Tuesday 21st November 2006

by williamshepherd @ 2006-11-20 - 11:15:48

For the past nine months Rye has had a Big Issue Seller in residence on the pavement in the High Street…and on occasions setting up his stall outside our local supermarket. He has two dogs, himself and a large rucksack. This constitutes stall dimensions…and outside Grammar School Records it monopolises one of the two benches.

bigissueweb

One fine woman of my acquaintance…bless her…with practical experience of homelessness from devoting part of her life to setting up and running a Battered Woman’s Hostel in Central London has tried to get behind the Big Issue Seller’s situation…quizzing me about the intricacies of Working Tax Credit along the way. I don’t do guilt trips but I know someone who does…bless her…each time she walks along the High Street unsure of which side of the street to pass him by.

The Vicar of St Mary’s…bless him…wrings his hands and discusses with one of his more generously minded parishioners…bless him…the idea of putting the Big Issue Seller into a caravan for the winter. Caravans can be acquired. But a landowner willing and able to accept a caravan, two dogs and a Big Issue Seller is another matter. I suspect there are dozens of similar stories around town. Does one person have the right to generate so much unease?

There are two big issues here with half the proceeds of one going to the seller…a decent percentage by charitable standards. But the other is of interest too. John Stuart Mill argued that people can do as they wish…provided they do not stop others doing as they wish. The philosophy of the Modern Welfare State…throughout Europe…believes Welfare Recipients participate in a Social Contract with mutual rights and duties. There is no such thing as a free lunch. The Queen’s Pence is yours but in return you must make yourself available for Work. No work - no benefits.

Since 1997 Parenting and Caring have been viewed as Work and a Roof Over Your Head has become equivalent to a basic right. The moral case for pensions has also shifted. Thirty years of Past Work has long been regarded as endowing full Pension Benefit Entitlement. But Present Work is also entering the equation. Many one-, and even two-income families are only kept afloat by grandparents minding the children.

Our Big Issue Seller is entitled to shelter so either he doesn’t know this or he chooses not to avail himself of Rented Accommodation and Housing Benefit from Rother District Council. If he is homeless it is by choice or from ignorance…or by refusal or inability to work. Local people who feel guilty should not fool themselves. Old-style Liberals have no philosophical objection to someone over-nighting on The Salts in summer but in winter there is a problem. Either he will infringe on somebody’s personal property rights…trespassing to stay warm…or end up in a National Health hospital at tax payers expense. So it is time to take issue with John Bird the founder of The Big Issue.

The Big Issue was a clever entrepreneurial idea in Thatcher’s Britain. But it is past its sell-by date. There will always be a case for a Campaigning Journal on Homes, Shelter and Housing…immigrants, second homes and pre-empting residential property for commercial use are topical issues. But in the New Labour Welfare State where housing is an entitlement Big Issue Selling should be seen as Charitable Collection. The collector should not be seen as a Homeless Person but as a Charitable Object. From the Public Policy point of view the Big Issue Seller is a Stallholder. If he does not have the requisite Planning Permission or Trading Licence he should be moved on by the police.

Selling Big Issues is not a job. It is not gainful employment in any meaningful sense but a form of begging. Ayn Rand viewed Society as made up of Producers, Looters and Moochers. Producers create wealth for Society. Looters use laws to destroy the wealth of Society while Moochers use guilt. In The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged Ayn Rand shows the degrading effects this has on the souls of the Second-Raters who live by the Looters' and Moochers' codes.

Getting the Big Issue Seller off the street yields immediate benefits to everybody. But what of the Big Issue Seller? Ayn Rand sidesteps the question of redemption…of how to turn Moochers into Producers. Virginia Woolf wrote a book entitled A Room of Your Own that considers the question. But the title is misleading. The room is just the first step…and without Money of Your Own it is of little worth.

Virginia Woolf understood Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Rooms and money are just the first steps towards Self-Esteem and Self-Actualisation. An enlightened society’s policy for its Big Issue Sellers would not seek to enforce the contractual terms of the Social Contract for the Queen’s Pence but would recognise the need for a Period of Convalescence. One week of benefit without a duty to work for each week on the streets is one form such a policy might take. Local people could even chip in a bob of two.

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

William Shepherd [Visitor]

10/02/07 @ 11:09

Jim Hollands, editor of Rye’s Own, published this piece in the January 2007 issue (Number 150). Three responses were published in the following issue and a further one in the March issue. Here they are:

From Heather Sutton of Winchelsea Beach:
Who does he think he is? Big Issue. He has a name and is a very pleasant chap indeed. He has as much right as W. Shepherd and the rest of us to be in Rye High Street at any time. W. Shepherd should listen to the song Streets of London then perhaps he would change his mind although after such a pompous article I very much doubt it. Bless him.

From Joan Porter of Rye:
Dear William. I am sure that people will be beating a path to your door desperate for your particular brand of heavy-handed intellectualism as you inveigh against the Big Issue and in particular the Big Issue seller in Rye whom you dismiss so disdainfully in your recent ‘think’ piece in Rye’s Own. His name William is Matthew. Like some old Tory diehard from the shires you patronise Matthew and what he does. By discussing him as if he did not exist you enter dangerous personal territory of your own. Presumably you have no understanding and care even less about how some people feel demeaned by the knowledge that they could not exist without benefits. Selling the Big Issue is a way of feeling a tiny piece of self-respect, self-reliance and independence, and being connected to life and people, however unimportant and insignificant any of that may be to you William. You say ‘…selling Big Issues is not a job…it is not gainful employment in any meaningful sense but a form of begging…’ It has meaning for Matthew but then you wouldn’t know that. Would you feel better if Matthew had a wooden leg and a bloody head, the dog was covered in suppurating sores, and they both begged for alms and lived in a cardboard box? Somewhere along the line William your soul has frozen over. You mention Virginia Woolf’s essay A Room of One’s Own – not Your Own as you refer to it – which discusses women in writing with a conclusion that to achieve greatness, women need a solid income and privacy. Perfectly fine for VW as she possessed both these things being left £500 a year by her aunt giving her economic independence and living the cocooned life of a middle-class intellectual and a lion of literacy. Hardly relevant in this story. Anyway William time for me to now go and beat up the servants and spit on my live-in tramp. As I feel your piece is far more deserving of a higher audience than a gentle local magazine I’m sending a copy of ‘Two Big Issues’ for comment to ‘Big Issue, The Guardian and an independent film producer pal of mine who is making a film on the new homeless. They will all be thrilled by you. Incidentally William avoid the excessive and unnecessary use of capital letters as it makes you seem like man-in-library-writing-on-green-lined-paper-to-HM-Queen; not a socioeconomic group I feel you would wish to associate with.

From Heidi Foster of Rye Harbour:
I am not surprised that WS is hiding behind his pseudonym writing this particular right wing article in which truth has been misrepresented. I am 'the fine acquaintance', one of the people he patronises in this piece and portrays as 'bless me/her' guilt ridden individual. I would like to put a few facts right. I managed a centre for the homeless and set up a hostel for them in Central London, not a Woman's Refuge though I was on their committee. The job was a challenge with rewards (80 homeless people through the door nearly every day) and paid my bills, it was hardly a good deed to feel holy. I did ask rather than quiz a few questions about working credit because of his experience of it. If WS knew anything about homeless people he would know it would not be appropriate for them. In fact I asked for a friend of mine who is a gardener. As WS makes all kinds of assumptions as to why people are and remain homeless I take it that he has not talked to the person in the High Street Matthew whom he uses to intellectualise a human condition and show his own ignorance around the subject. I talk to Matthew every time I come into Rye and thus know his story and reasoning. If WS only had asked me a few questions I could have enlightened him on homelessness, having worked and politicked in the field for 15 years. It would have been a more interesting and informative article. I am sure many Rye people would agree with me that Matthew does not take over the bench but everyone is happy to use it if they want to linger there. Matthew used the corner of it once when he hurt his foot and could not stand on it. I would like to take the opportunity to enlighten WS on his misguided idea about the Big Issue. The reason for setting it up was to give an individual a purpose, hope for something better, possibility of self respect rather than remain begging, pitied, spat on, dehumanised and rejected. WS says selling the Big Issue is not gainful employment. I would disagree strongly. The person buys a product up front which she/he then sells to people who choose to buy it. They get a Big issue permit which allows them to become a vendor and then have to negotiate with the relevant power to be at the spot they want to sell from. Having talked to staff at the Gramophone Record Shop there seems to be no problem for them. The money the vendor makes (for the hours they stand in all weathers it may not be much) but for many it is a way to get off or remain outside the benefit system or to pay for the odd warm night in a hostel bed or B&B. And yes some use it to buy drink but few are drunk while selling the Big Issue which improves their health in the long run. WS tries to justify his convoluted rant/argument, if there is one, by throwing in unrelated literary quotes. It doesn't impress me but I will use part of one to conclude. Let us all look into our soul including you WS and ask ourselves by what code we live by 'looters, moochers or producers'. And no one has the right to judge another. Only our conscience can determine the truth of this if we have the courage.'

From Mrs J Eccleston of Northiam
'Regarding William Shepherd's article 'Two Big Issues' on the January edition, I feel compelled to write in defence of Matthew, Rye's Big Issue seller. Has Mr. Shepherd ever taken the time to even speak to him I wonder? I feel his comments are extremely derogatory and uncharitable. It may be that our Big Issue seller has indeed been offered accommodation by the Council in the past but would have been unable to keep his trusty companions, his dogs, who he cares for very much. Or he may have taken up accommodation but found himself in a block of flats with alcoholics and drug users as his neighbours and therefore decided he would rather be homeless again. Having arrived in Rye approximately a year ago he must have found the streets relatively safe in comparison. The residents of Rye who stop to speak to him do not necessarily feel guilty as Mr Shepherd puts it, rather they are just more caring and would rather have this man have the opportunity to put his life back on track. If he could be found somewhere suitable to live I feel sure given the chance he would be willing to work to support himself. Matthew is neither a looter or a moocher.'

The blog owner changed this comment on 10/03/07 12:45

helena shepherd [Visitor]
http://www.devon.gov.uk
14/02/07 @ 17:38

This blog on homelessness is incorrect in several factual details. I would expect a lot more humility, not to mention compassion.

The blog owner changed this comment on 10/03/07 12:35

This blog was about the need for local licensing of Big Issue Sellers and the removal of the anomolous (legal) position of the Big Issue as neither charity nor business...a privileged position acquired by assiduous lobbying of Labour Party functionaries...Bernie Ecclestone would have been impressed.

My personal position is that I am in favour of a licence to Big Issue Sellers in Rye probably for 6-months with permits issued by the Rye Town Council...not by the Big Issue Foundation although prior vetting by them also makes sense. This should be renewable once or twice and have conditions attached. A local referendum approving the procedure would be appropriate.

Before my piece appeared in the local paper I would have predicted that the predominantly Daily Mail and Sun reading local electorate would have voted 3 to 1 against having a Big Issue Seller on Rye High Street.

My next piece for Rye's Own...appearing in the March issue...is about empty dwellings in Rye and the need for the local council to adopt the Norwegian policy of maintaining a register and issuing permits to property owners wishing to keep their houses empty.

After my two pieces I would expect the arguments in this small town to be much more evenly balanced...and much better informed...with a consensus starting to move towards my political positions on homes and homelessness. At this point I would predict that any local referendum would be too close to call.

William Shepherd [Visitor]

12/03/07 @ 14:59

Below is the text of a private e-mail from a resident of Rye:

'I felt you may well have had enough of all the angry comments your Two Big Issue article has generated. It did, in some areas sound harsh but I don't think you deserved the degree of vitriole (grammar?) it generated. I totally agree with your suggestion that the Big Issue Sellers should be licensed. I went to Glasgow about 8 years ago and they were literally on every corner. I cannnot imagine that there was enough money to go around for them all. There was an era when it was suggested that some people selling the Big Issue were exploiting the system and making a fortune. I cannot imagine how they did so. Is mine an empty house? I do have a conscience there actually!'

Compassion and tenderness are complicated matters. Somerset Maugham has something interesting to say on the matter in The Razor's Edge (1944). Nobody reads Somerset Maugham anymore. They should. He is one of the great 20th century writers.

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).